Ahmed Usman Ododo, the All Progressives Congress (APC) candidate for governor of Kogi State, will find out the outcome of a new court fight aiming to have him removed from the race.

On Wednesday, the Federal High Court in Abuja upheld Ahmed Ododo as the APC candidate for the Kogi state governorship election on November 11, 2023. Abubakar Achimugu, an APC candidate for governor in the state, filed a new appeal with the Court of Appeal in Abuja, and the court reserved judgment.

After the parties adopted their written addresses, a three-judge panel of the appellate court, led over by Justice Muhammed Lawal Shuaibu, reserved the date for the appeal’s verdict.

The appeal was against the judgment of Justice Obiora Egwuatu of the Federal High Court, Abuja delivered on 18th July which held that Ahmed Ododo can lawfully continue to fly the flag of the APC in the November 11, 2023 governorship election in Kogi State.

Justice Shuaib after taking arguments from lawyers in the matter announced the indefinite adjournment in the judgment delivery and that parties would be communicated as soon as the judgment is ready.

Achimugu had approached the high court with a suit seeking to disqualify Ododo from contesting the November 11 governorship election on grounds that he did not resign his employment with the Kogi State public service 30 days before contesting the governorship primary election.

The suit was thrown out on the ground of lacking in merit among others.

Not satisfied with the high court decision, Achimugu, in a Notice of Appeal filed on July 21 through his counsel, Josiah Daniel-Ebune said Justice Egwuatu erred in law and occasioned a miscarriage of justice when he held that Ododo and Salami Deedat (2nd and 3rd defendants) duly resigned their appointment.

The aggrieved Governorship aspirant argued that Justice Egwuatu was wrong in holding that Ododo was not caught up with the mandatory provision of what the law requires them to do before they participated in the APC’s governorship primary election for Kogi state held on April 15, 2023.

He said the trial court also erred in law when, in dismissing his suit, ignored the uncontroverted evidence regarding credibility of the two purported letters of resignation exhibited by the APC, Ododo and Deedat and expressly rejected his paragraphs 5.2 – 5.4 of his reply address of the imperative of Ododo and Deedat lodging the said purported letters of the resignation along with their expression of interest form with APC within the 30 days, required by law, by holding that such contention is not supported by any law.

Achimugu said the trial Judge erred in law and misconceived the purport of his originating summons by holding that he changed his case from the original contention and was therefore not consistent in presenting the case, by approbating and reprobating, as a result, he prejudged the amended originating summons and thereby came to an erroneous decision dismissing his suit.

According to Achimugu, the trial court erred in law in misapplying the provision of Section 306(2) of the constitution and the cases of Yusuf Vs Governor of Edo state and Zubair Vs Mohammed to the facts and issues in his case and occasioned a miscarriage of justice, among other grounds.

He asked the Appellate Court for an order setting aside the judgment of the trial court and granting all his reliefs sought in his amended originating summons.